View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
i8dbear Founding Father
Joined: 22 Feb 2005 Posts: 181 Location: Los Angeles
|
Posted: Mon May 02, 2005 10:38 pm Post subject: player database suggestion |
|
|
I found selecting multiple players in the new player database to be awkward. control+selecting on a mac (the traditional method for non-contiguous selection) occasionally yielded text editing boxes, and scrolling often deselected players.
may i suggest that you institute a simple checkbox system for this database? it would be easier.
other than that, it shows great promise.
.nelson |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MarcoB Founding Father
Joined: 10 Mar 2005 Posts: 56 Location: The Woodlands
|
Posted: Tue May 03, 2005 1:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
How about removing the one's from the list which are selected? So you will see players on the left, all the non-players on the right. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rastapete Founding Father
Joined: 13 Feb 2005 Posts: 401 Location: 'Ipsa' this, you pissy little bitch!
|
Posted: Tue May 03, 2005 1:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Isn't Command-click the usual way to multiple select on the Macintosh? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
i8dbear Founding Father
Joined: 22 Feb 2005 Posts: 181 Location: Los Angeles
|
Posted: Fri May 06, 2005 11:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
yes, but it's strangely non-conforming in the TM. one, if you select someone and then press cmd in order to select the next, the first switches to edit mode. second, if you are selecting a large number of players, which requires scrolling of the list, it is very easy to have your selections nullified by a mis-click or a scrolling error. check boxes would be much more convenient. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
5thStreetPokerParties.com Founding Father
Joined: 28 Mar 2005 Posts: 145 Location: MINNESOTA
|
Posted: Sat May 07, 2005 5:39 pm Post subject: no issues |
|
|
I'm not exactly sure which section you were referring to here...
But if you are talking about any of the in-play pop-up functions (eliminations, rebuys, etc.), I haven't had any problems with the interface.
Being a software developer myself, I can see the challenge with presenting this functionality to the user. If you have a large field of participants (50+) you run the risk of not having enough screen real-estate to present all those check-boxes.
With this in mind, I'd rather have the multiple-select list box. _________________ "Play Like The Pros Play"
http://www.5thStreetPokerParties.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MaxPower Founding Father
Joined: 13 Feb 2005 Posts: 390 Location: Funky Cold Medina - Ohio
|
Posted: Mon May 09, 2005 5:53 am Post subject: Re: no issues |
|
|
5thStreetPokerParties.com wrote: | I'm not exactly sure which section you were referring to here...
But if you are talking about any of the in-play pop-up functions (eliminations, rebuys, etc.), I haven't had any problems with the interface.
Being a software developer myself, I can see the challenge with presenting this functionality to the user. If you have a large field of participants (50+) you run the risk of not having enough screen real-estate to present all those check-boxes.
With this in mind, I'd rather have the multiple-select list box. |
Ditto - except the software developer thing - I'm just a rocket scientist...
-Max _________________ Oh, Yeah! Check out the all new TheMiddleClassBlog.com for all of us that aren't exactly "High Rollers"! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
drneau Site Admin
Joined: 13 Feb 2005 Posts: 2385 Location: Woodbury, MN
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|