drneau.com

[macker]

Hello,

I was just wondering what people's opinions are on the best ranking method for this situation. We play once a week 3 tourney's in a night

We buy in for $100. Based on 10 guys we want to put $200 aside per tourney ($600/week) and then run a ranking system. Then at the end of each month top 2 would split $2400 ($1600 for 1st and $800 for second). I was think the percentile average would work. We don't want someone to be penalized for missing one week but there has to be some sort of minimum tournaments played in order to be considered for the monthly.

Thoughts? Welcomed and appreciated.

Macker

[flybryfly]

I have been using Dr. Neau's Tournament Manager for over two years now. I have been happy with it and cannot wait for the next version...hope it is Mac-friendly.

To see the ranking method I use for over 100 players in a 10-event "season," visit www.pacesedge.com/poker

I use the rankings to determine chip stacks at the end of the year. The "better" players should have some form of "home-field" advantage was my thought. Gives people incentive to return to the table each Circuit Event as well.

Yes, it does favor people that play everytime, but hey...if Tiger Woods takes a year off...doesn't his ranking go down? I say reward the player that plays each time. That is better than not showing up.

Penny for your thoughts,
-pACE